Gianmarco Ferrari vs Naoki Tajima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Apr at 10:08 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Ferrari vs N. Tajima

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ferrari 1 - 0 Tajima
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gianmarco Ferrari winning 2 and Naoki Tajima winning 0. The last match between Gianmarco Ferrari and Naoki Tajima was at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula, 18-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Gianmarco Ferrari getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ferrari | 1 |
| Tajima | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Santa Margherita di Pula(04-18-25)
G. Ferrari vs N. Tajima H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,280 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.70% (192-159) | Career Total W/L | 49.85% (166-167) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Ferrari vs N. Tajima Match Preview:
Ah, the thrill of tennis! Where players prance around the court, smacking fuzzy yellow balls and trying to outdo each other in the art of point-winning. And who do we have here? It's none other than Ferrari and Tajima, the dynamic duo of net-smashers, ready for yet another captivating showdown. So, who should we place our bets on, you ask? Let's dive into the stats with a hearty dollop of humor.
First off, let’s examine their second serve antics, because nobody likes a boring serve, right? Ferrari has been zipping around with a 40.11% success rate on second serves, whereas Tajima ever-so-slightly edges ahead with 40.55%. Not much to separate them there, both have room for improvement where Daffy Duck wouldn't make their tennis coach cry. But when it comes to returning serves, Ferrari has chomped down on 46.62% of his opponents’ second serve points while Tajima sipped his tea at 43.11%. For the first serve returns, Ferrari impresses with a nifty 32.68%, whereas Tajima manages a respectable, albeit slightly lower, 29.41%. Note to their opponents: be ready for a return on your serve that might just fly back faster than a boomerang.
Under the scalding pressure of breakpoints, Ferrari transforms into a beacon of calm, saving 48.15% of them like a boss, while Tajima hits the snooze button at 41.18%. It’s almost like Tajima misplaces his tennis racquet when the break points show up, bless him. In the match win department, our participants are almost like mirrored imposters. Ferrari boasts a win rate of 57.69% with a record of 30/22, and Tajima tips the scale ever so slightly higher at 58.06% with a 36/26 record.
When it comes to surface preferences, Ferrari dances like a nimble gazelle on clay, winning 55% of his matches, but gets tangled like earbuds on I.hard with a mere 37% win percentage. Tajima, on the other hand, boss dances on Hard with a 51% win tally, while the grassy courts turn him into a befuddled puppy, capping his wins at 20%. Both have gallivanted around Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tourneys, notching respective win rates of 63.04% for Ferrari and 59.02% for Tajima.
Throw them into a nail-biting deciding set, and Ferrari emerges victorious 59% of the time, slightly more often than Tajima at 54%. So, if things get tight, think Ferrari going for gold like it's the final countdown. And as the players whack those ball breakers, Ferrari converts 40.66% of his breakpoints, compared to Tajima sneaking up with a respectable 37.93% conversion.
Considering the average rank of opponents they've faced, Ferrari at 413.77 and Tajima at a higher rank of 39.56, the scales seem tantalizingly balanced. Crypto investments might be simple, but predicting tennis outcomes with these players means contemplating the relative event level and past performances like a wise Yogi Bear pondering a basket of picnic treats.
Predicted winners? Based purely on the stats, especially considering both their second serves and those all-important deciding sets, Ferrari might just edge the win in this battle of racquety wits. But whatever happens, let’s hope for a match delightful enough to make even the sternest umpire chuckle.
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Naoki Tajima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Ferrari vs N. Tajima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:57:0 | Average Match Time | 0:57:0 |
| 73% (27/37) | 1st Serve % | 71% (32/45) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (19/32) |
| 50% (5/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (19/45) | Return Points Win % | 30% (11/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Ferrari Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
F | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
SF | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
N. Tajima Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||

G. Ferrari vs N. Tajima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.70% (192/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.85% (166/167) |
| 53.49% (429/373) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.47% (377/370) |
| 51.67% (3878/3627) | Games Win/Loss | 50.40% (3452/3397) |
| 46.43% (13/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.44% (125/118) |
| 57.29% (169/126) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.83% (33/36) |
| 35.71% (10/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 951 | Aces Total | 856 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 996 | Total Double Faults | 937 |
| 1:26:36 | Average Match Time | 1:15:13 |
| 429.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 413.27 |
| 60% (11974/19858) | 1st Serve % | 54% (8803/16386) |
| 66% (7957/11974) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5959/8803) |
| 50% (3969/7884) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3589/7582) |
| 44% (891/2030) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (735/1581) |
| 41% (8076/19819) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6595/16429) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.55% (27/35) | Challenger W/L | 22.73% (5/17) |
| 57.75% (164/120) | Futures W/L | 51.77% (161/150) |
| 54% (187/344) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (162/324) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 48% (51/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (28/48) |
| 53% (56/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (37/83) |
| 84% (180/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (169/143) |
| 16% (180/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (169/26) |
| 23% (171/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (164/22) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Anna Siskova vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets

Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets

Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets

Anhelina Kalinina vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets

Shuai Zhang vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
